Distinguishing Features of Project Management in the 21st Century

The reason of this article is to look into the existing warm matters of project management. In the 21st century, there is a clear swift from difficult devices strategy of project management to gentle elements, a demand for strategic thinking in project management (Buttrick, 2000), new achievements factors (Atkinson, 1999) and venture uncertainty management (Ward & Chapman, 2003). Broader project management principle and far more intense research efforts are also a development in the field (Winter season & Smith, 2005).

Human beings have been executing assignments from historical instances (Kwak, 2003). From relocating a tribe to constructing tremendous buildings these kinds of as the pyramids, assignments were a dominant factor of historical past. Not extended in the past, these concerned in initiatives understood that they wanted solutions and processes to assistance them regulate these tasks more proficiently. To fulfill this require, researchers and practitioners labored with each other to form a new notion which was identified as «project management». In accordance to the PMBOK’s definition “project management is the application of information, competencies, applications and procedures to challenge pursuits to satisfy venture prerequisites”. (A Tutorial to Project Management Human body of Expertise, 2004). There are quite a few distinct sights in the literature concerning the beginning of project management. Maylor (2005) mentions that “project management in the way that we would realize it right now did not exist until finally the 1950s” and Wideman (2001) tracks the to start with use of project management in the UK’s Institution of Civil Engineers report on British isles post war nationwide improvement to start with released in 1944.

Considering that then, there have been a ton of adjustments. “The hard systems method, which treated the project as a mechanical activity, has been demonstrated to be flawed” (Maylor, 2005). The comfortable expertise of project management are receiving much more attention because it is now apparent that “the capacity to implement these skills proficiently throughout the life cycle of a undertaking will enhance the success of a task exponentially” (Belzer). In spite of the great knowledge of planning, scheduling and managing, initiatives have nevertheless a large rate of failure. Belzer factors out that “additional typically they fall short because of a task manager’s incapability to communicate successfully, work within the organization’s lifestyle, inspire the undertaking staff, regulate stakeholder expectations, understand the business aims, remedy challenges properly, and make crystal clear and professional decisions”. To tackle these issues in the 21st century, a job group needs to build a series of smooth capabilities such as “communication, crew building, overall flexibility and creativity, management and the skill to handle stress and conflict”. (Sukhoo et. al, 2005).

In addition, project management involves a much better strategy orientation. “A lot more than 80 for each cent of all troubles at the job level are induced by failures at a board level in firms to provide very clear plan and priorities” (Maylor, 2001). The tactic that Maylor suggests is pretty distinct from the standard url involving strategy and initiatives, as he proposes a “coherent, co-ordinated, focused, strategic competence in project management which sooner or later provides source of competitive advantage”. This two-way methodology that relates organisational and project strategy is illustrated in figure 1. To superior fully grasp the project’s strategy, there is also a have to have to analyse “the experiences from previous things to do, politics for the duration of the pre-project phases, parallel programs of occasions happening during undertaking execution and suggestions about the post-project upcoming” (Mats Engwall, 2002).

Furthermore, Maylor highlights a change in project’s results criteria, from conformance to overall performance. In 1960s venture supervisors search for to comply only with the documented technical specs of the venture, though recent tasks require true functionality. In other text, the good results standards of the 21st century as indicated by Maylor have improved to as shorter time as achievable, as cheaply as achievable and to a maximum purchaser delight. Other academics imply these days a significantly easier view of results criteria which is targeted only in holding the consumer joyful (Ferguson, 2005) in distinction with the 90s see of just finishing the job on time and on finances.

Adjustments in possibility management are also a single of the hot matters of project management in the new century. Ward (2003) suggest the term «uncertainty management» and endorses that a “target on «uncertainty» relatively than danger could enrich task danger management”. Adams has an exciting watch of threat as he describes it as “a reflexive phenomenon – we reply to perceived probabilities and magnitudes, therefore altering them”, a definition that differs from the common quantitive assessment of possibility. Green broads even extra the scope of risk management and includes the consumers. He thinks that “the procedure of risk management only gets to be significant by way of the lively participation of the client’s venture stakeholders”. In his place of look at there is a new way of assessing threat management that “relies upon a lot less on probabilistic forecasting and additional upon the have to have to preserve a viable political consistency within the client organisation”.

The common idea of project management consists of a slim focus on jobs as unique and absolutely separated models of work. But present-day projects are likely to be built-in effortlessly in the normal context of organizations in purchase to “create the «management of project portfolios» and «programme management» which are extra strategically orientated toward «doing the proper projects»” (Wintertime & Smith, 2005).
It is common ground in the literature that the concept of project management needs far more research. Koskela and Howell (2002) recommend that the theoretical base “has been implicit and it rests on a faulty comprehending of the character of work in projects, and deficient definitions of planning, execution and manage”. From their level of watch, enrichment of project management with new techniques and techniques are not able to be completed with any secure theoretical track record. As a outcome, there is a craze of placing additional effort and hard work in research and rethinking the way which «bodies of knowledge» is prepared so that intricate projects’ actions will be much better documented.

As a conclusion, we could use the text of D.T. Jones (2005) who writes that “project management is no longer about controlling the sequence of actions necessary to comprehensive the challenge on time”. He provides that “it is about systematically incorporating the voice of the shopper, producing a disciplined way of prioritising effort and hard work and resolving trade-offs, functioning concurrently on all facets of the projects in multi-purposeful teams”.


1.A Guidebook to Project Management System of Awareness, 2004, 3rd Version, Project Management Institute

2.Adams, Critique for THES Danger Decision and Coverage, Cambridge College Push, [Electronic]

3.Atkinson, 1999, Project management: price, time and top quality, two very best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to acknowledge other results requirements, Global Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 337±342, [Electronic]

4.Belzer, Project Management : Nonetheless Far more Art than Science, [Electronic]

5.Buttrick, 2000, The challenge work out, 2nd version

6.Engwall, 2003, No job is an island: linking jobs to heritage and context, Research Policy 32, pp. 789-808, [Electronic]

7.Ferguson, 2005, Initial Tutorial on Strategic Management, Comprehensive Time MSc in Project Management, Lancaster University

8.Inexperienced, In the direction of an built-in script for threat and value management, Department of Development Management & Engineering, The College of Studying, Uk

9.Jones, 2005, Foreward to Maylor’s e-book Project Management, FT Prentice Hall, United kingdom

10.Koskela & Howell, 2002, The fundamental concept of project management is out of date, Project Management Institute, [Electronic]

11.Kwak, 2003, The Tale of Controlling Assignments, Quorum Guides, [Electronic]

12.Maylor, 2005, Project Management, FT Prentice Hall, United kingdom

13.Maylor, 2001, Outside of the Gantt Chart:: Project Management Transferring on, European Management Journal Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 92-100, 2001, United kingdom, [Electronic]

14.Sukhoo, Barnard, Eloff, Van der Poll Accommodating Delicate Expertise in Software program Project Management, Difficulties in Informing Science and Facts Technology, College of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa, [Electronic]

15.Ward, 2003, Transforming venture possibility management into job uncertainty management, Worldwide Journal of Project Management vol.21, pp. 97-105, [Electronic]

16.Wideman, 2001, Requirements for a Project Management entire body of expertise, [Electronic]

17.Winter season & Smith, 2005, ‘Rethinking Project Management, Earning Feeling So Considerably: Rising Instructions and Upcoming Research’, Rethinking Project Management (EPSRC Network 2004-2006), [Electronic]